LeoAfricanus
  • Blog
  • Writing
  • About
  • Get In Touch
  • Blog
  • Writing
  • About
  • Get In Touch
"Any way the wind blows" - Queen, Bohemian Rhapsody

Strange, International Political Economy, Cui bono

13/3/2019

 
Recently I read Susan Strange’s seminal book, “States and Markets”.Strange, who died in 1998, was a long time academic in the field of international relations and international political economy[1].The book was originally published in 1988, and focuses on “power” as a concept to analyze relationships in international politics and economics.Indeed, one important point she makes is that the fields of politics and economics are often split, providing for academically “clean” theories and methodologies, but loosing the capacity to understand what is happening in the real world.As Palan’s foreword notes, “Markets are integrated, politics affects economics, economics affects politics, and structural power has this uncanny ability to travel between different contexts.”Interestingly, Strange notes that, “In real life, durable conditions in political economy cannot be created which ignore the interlocking interests of powerful people.The problem – which never has an easy, quick or permanent solution – is to find that balance of interest of power that allows a working set of bargains to be hammered out and observed.”Important in any analysis, according to Strange, was the question “who benefits” (Cui bono?)[2].
 
In her model, Strange identifies four key “structures of power” in the world economy, namely security, production, finance and knowledge.This seems somewhat random (or maybe evolves through time) in terms of sectors, and the balance of power between states and firms may also evolve[3].With some of the reading I’ve been doing recently, the question of power in the telecommunication and internet domain is particularly interesting.A great read for this has been Laura DeNardis’, “The Global War for Internet Governance”. Power and responsibilities are spread out over a range of institutions, both public and private, and constantly shifting (and arguably, not always clear).In a sense, this is “multistakeholder governance”.However, with the economic and political importance of the internet only increasing, is this sufficient?Knowing the economic importance – including with significant impact on poverty reduction – is this sufficient?Cui bono?

 
13.3.2019, Niamey, Niger.


 


[1] http://www.lse.ac.uk/about-lse/lse-leading-women/biographies/susan-strange

[2] See, for example, May’s, “Strange fruit: Susan Strange’s theory of structural power in the international political economy”.

[3] A point also made in the above article by May.

Comments are closed.

    Author

    Online encampment of A. S. Barry.  Disparate and not-so-disparate thoughts on international relations, development, writing, and life.

    All writings and publishing on the website reflect strictly personal opinions.  These in no way reflect the position of the EEAS, EU, or any other institution.

    Archieven

    December 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    June 2021
    April 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    September 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017

    Categorieën

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly